|
George
Bush Knows Why They Hate Us
By
Jason Miller
08/07/05
"ICH" -- -- Why do they hate us? President George
Bush posed this question to the American public shortly after
9/11. It is a strong affirmation of the power of propaganda that
some Americans still pose this as a serious question, and are
legitimately dumb-founded that such antipathy exists toward the
United States. Our government, media and schools start burnishing
the false notion of American moral superiority into our brains at
a very young age. However, beneath the thin veneer of their
white-washed accounts of history and current events, abundant
sources of information reveal the true malevolence of
the moneyed elite who rule
America
. There is a great body of evidence which obliterates the
inane notion that the
United States
is a benevolent world leader. Despite the ready availability of
contrary evidence, many Americans remain blind to the truth about
our despised nation, and choose to believe the fairy tale version
of “truth, justice and the
American Way
”. The sad reality is that
America
is an imperialistic, avaricious war machine ruled by the wealthy.
Yes, much of the world despises this nation. Our leaders have
virtually assured abhorrence of America, and what’s more,
they do not care!
Hubris,
avarice, over-consumption….what's not to love?
America
’s Corporatacracy is leading the human race down a path of
global extinction. Representing only 5% of the world population,
the
United States
consumes 25% of the world's energy and possesses
approximately 27% of its wealth. Through lobbying efforts and
major campaign donations, the major oil companies ensure the
implementation of government policies that ensure continued
dependence on fossil fuels, a non-renewable resource (for more on
this, study the theory of Hubbert Peak theory at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peak_oil).
Despite being a significant contributor to the greenhouse effect,
the US Plutocracy has spent millions of dollars to create junk
science (look to efforts by the Cato Institute) to
"debunk" the notion of global warming, and has refused
to sign the Kyoto Treaty. The
United States
innovated, tested (on hundreds of thousands of human
beings), and possesses devastating nuclear weapons. Yet
with blatant hubris and hypocrisy, our ruling Oligarchs attempt to
dictate which nations can and cannot develop nuclear capabilities.
America
’s allies, like
Pakistan
,
India
, and
Israel
have developed nuclear weaponry with
America
's blessing, while countries like
Iran
are forbidden to even acquire the technology to generate nuclear
power. The ruling Aristocracy of the United States has long
exhibited a flagrant disregard for international law, world
opinion, and most recently, for the United Nations (consider the
appointment of John Bolton as America’s UN
"ambassador").
While
the rest of the world has many reasons to hate the United States,
perhaps their most compelling motivation is the mayhem, abject
poverty, and murder resulting from the imperialistic endeavors of
the US military industrial complex, which includes the Departments
of Defense, Homeland Security, and Energy; the intelligence
community; and the myriad private corporations which have
incestuous relationships with the government (i.e. Halliburton).
Spending $500 billion per year on the perpetuation of the world's
largest and mightiest war machine, the
US
(with a mere 5% of the world's population) accounts for half of
the world's military spending. Regardless of which half of the
Democratic/Republican Duopoly has been in power, the ruling elite
has perpetuated domination of the rest of the world
through direct military intervention (think Iraq), economic
warfare (i.e. the persistent yet failed policies toward Cuba), and
overt or covert support of ruthless totalitarian regimes which
advance the interests of US corporations (i.e. the Shah of Iran).
Not
as free as we are taught we are, but still freer than most….in
spite of them
Despite
the ruthless devotion of our aristocratic leaders to
unrestrained capitalism, the perpetuation of a majority of the
wealth remaining in the hands of the few (the wealthiest 20% of
Americans possess 83% of our nation's vast wealth), and the
reduction of the civil liberties of "commoners", the
brilliant Constitution drafted by our forefathers has maintained a
semblance of a liberal democracy in the United States. The fact
that I am writing this essay for publication is a testament to
that fact. However, before celebrating too hard, remember that
throughout American history there has been an ebb and flow of
social justice, and the tide is clearly ebbing. Need evidence?
Consider the Patriot Act, the war in Iraq, the declaration of a
perpetual state of war on terror (increasing the authority of the
federal government), higher regressive taxes, lower progressive
taxes, a growing concentration of political power in the hands of
legalistic Christians (the Religious Right), legislated
discrimination against gays, an erosion of affirmative action, and
a significant decline in funding for social safety net programs
(i.e. Medicaid) coupled with increases in defense spending. As
Americans, we still enjoy many of the freedoms guaranteed by the
Bill of Rights, but we enjoy them in spite of the true nature and
intent of our leaders. We are taught and programmed to believe
that we enjoy these freedoms because of the imperialistic
endeavors of our elite leaders (like the "War to End All
Wars"), which "keep the world safe for democracy".
The reality is that Americans remain free because of the ongoing
vigilance of many amongst us, and to some extent because allowing
a degree of freedom amongst their own subjects enables the
American ruling class to engage in aggression against other
nations under the pretext of "spreading freedom and
democracy".
Like
Capra’s Potter, these “warped frustrated old men” view
people as cattle….
The
American ruling elite's ultimate goal of global domination
precedes the well-being of its subjects. In fact, to the
US
aristocracy, the poor, working class, and diminishing middle
class are disposable cogs in their monolithic money-making
machine. They understand that they are endangering the American
people by continuing to foster hatred and inspire terrorism, but
it is of little consequence to them.
Concerning
America
’s current leadership, Noam Chomsky wrote:
For
the political leadership, mostly recycled from more reactionary
sectors of the Reagan–Bush I administrations, “the global wave
of hatred” is not a particular problem. They want to be feared,
not loved. They understand as well as their establishment critics
that their actions increase the risk of proliferation of weapons
of mass destruction (WMD) and terror. But that too is not a major
problem. Higher on the scale of priorities are the goals of
establishing global hegemony and implementing their domestic
agenda: dismantling the progressive achievements that have been
won by popular struggle over the past century and
institutionalizing these radical changes so that recovering them
will be no easy task.
While
both parties of the bloated, corrupt Duopoly ruling the
United States
are guilty of blatant violations of international law and crimes
against humanity throughout history, the current administration
has operated more brazenly and with more impunity. Kennedy had
Cuba
. Johnson and Nixon shared the culpability for the deaths of
over 3 million in
Vietnam
. Reagan bloodied his hands in
Nicaragua
.
Clinton
's bombing campaign killed thousands of innocents in Kosovo. Yet
somehow, these presidents managed to maintain the
United States'
image of an aloof and perhaps even benevolent super-power.
America
's current administration has not maintained this facade nearly as
well, and has led the
United States
down a path entailing a much more blatant disregard and disrespect
for international law and the rights of other nations. There are
numerous historical examples of the immoral, illegal, and
repulsive
US
imperial dominance of other nations achieved through a
variety of means, perhaps the most inclusive, perpetual, instructive,
and relevant example is that of
Iraq
. Recognizing a nation rife with political instabilities and
virtually incalculable riches through its oil reserves, the US
Plutocracy has been targeting
Iraq
for years. Bush II finally bagged it, but got more than he
bargained for in the process.
Today,
staunch ally….tomorrow, sworn enemy
One
of the most disturbing aspects of
US
involvement in
Iraq
has been our government’s schizophrenic relationship with Saddam
Hussein. Donald Rumsfeld, an influential member of the Reagan,
Bush I and now Bush II administrations made the following
statements that demonstrate the gross inconsistency of the US
Oligarchy’s position on Saddam and
Iraq
(explained by their shifting loyalties based on their shifting
needs for more money and power rather than a commitment to their
self-proclaimed Higher Purpose of spreading freedom):
"As
with all sovereign nations, we respect
Iraq
's independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity."
- Donald Rumsfeld, 1983
"This is a
regime that is responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands
of people."
-- Donald Rumsfeld March 21, 2003
In 1979, the year of the Iranian hostage crisis,
Saddam Hussein became president of
Iraq
as a member of the ruling Ba'ath party, which the CIA had
propelled to power in 1963. The following year,
Iraq
invaded
Iran
and the eight year Iran-Iraq war ensued. The cost was one million
lives. Before Ronald Reagan assumed the presidency in 1981, the
Carter administration had listed
Iraq
as a nation which sponsored terrorism. Despite this, and despite
the knowledge within the
US
intelligence community that
Iraq
had been building an arsenal of chemical weapons (WMDs) since the
mid 1970's, Reagan began supporting
Iraq
and Hussein in the war against
Iran
. Under
Reagan
,
Iraq
was no longer an "official" sponsor of
terrorism and quickly became a clandestine strategic ally of
the
United States
, with full eligibility for American economic and military aid
waiting in the wings. The US started funneling weaponry to support
Hussein’s' war effort through third parties like Egypt and Saudi
Arabia, and by 1983 was selling conventional arms directly to
Iraq.
In 1983,
US
envoy Donald Rumsfeld paid a personal visit to Hussein and
restored diplomatic relations, which had been cut during the 1967 Arab-Israel
War.
America
’s rulers resumed relations with
Iraq
despite their knowledge that Hussein had used chemical weapons
against
Iran
only a few months before. They also knew that Hussein was building
manufacturing facilities to produce more WMDs. Rumsfeld, one of
the strongest advocates of the removal of Hussein from
power under Bush II, was a strong proponent of the relationship
with Hussein under Reagan. By 1984, both the US State Department
and European doctors had confirmed that
Iraq
was using nerve gas against Iranians. After digesting this
information, the US Aristocracy decided to initiate a program
which forgave $5 billion worth of agricultural loans to
Iraq
between 1983 and 1990, freeing up more cash for Hussein to fund
his war machine.
Hussein's relationship with the
United States
came into full bloom in 1985. Protecting the flow of US weapons
and money to Saddam, the Reagan administration pressured a member
of Congress to drop a proposed resolution that would have
reclassified
Iraq
as a supporter of terrorism. The US Commerce Department began a
five year pattern of approving sales of US computers to
Iraq
for use in weapons labs. 1985 marked the advent of the Reagan
administration supplying Hussein with biological weapon
precursors like botulism and anthrax. By 1988, the
US
had made 70 shipments of these precursors to fuel Saddam’s WMD
program.
Perhaps the most egregious example of the
hypocrisy of the US Oligarchs in
Iraq
occurred in 1988. In March, Hussein launched a poisonous gas
attack and killed 5,000 Kurds in the Iraqi town of
Halabja
. In July, one of the Corporatacracy's own, Bechtel (Secretary of
State George Shultz’s' company), won a contract to build a
petrochemical plant, which Hussein could use to manufacture more
WMDs. Besides continuing to support
Iraq
and to enable its corporate darlings (like Honeywell, Rockwell,
Hewlett Packard, and DuPont) to profiteer from the war,
the Reagan administration crushed a Congressional attempt to
sanction Hussein for committing genocide against Iraqi Kurds.
Fall
from grace
Saddam Hussein committed political suicide in
1990 when he invaded
Kuwait
. With the Iran-Iraq conflict over, our ruling elite no longer
needed Hussein. Having the chutzpah to violate international law,
which
America
's leaders hold to be sacrosanct when it suits their purposes,
Hussein gave the
US
a justification for starting a war with him. The Gulf War served
several purposes for the US Aristocracy. It enabled them to
flex their military might as the
Soviet Union
, the world's other super-power, was collapsing. The victory over
Saddam erased the American public’s memory of the embarrassing
defeat in
Vietnam
. Most importantly, it enabled the Plutocracy to reap the
bountiful harvest of corporate profits fueled by a war.
America
’s ruling elite class knows the true bounties of war,
particularly if the opponent is relatively weak and hapless.
Estimates vary widely, but hundreds of thousands
of Iraqis died during the Gulf War and the period of harsh
economic sanctions which followed. On August 6, 1990 (shortly
after Iraq invaded Kuwait), the United Nations Security Council,
led by the United States, imposed "comprehensive"
economic sanctions on Iraq. These sanctions remained in place
after the US-led coalition forces drove Hussein from
Kuwait
a year later. Before the Gulf War,
Iraq
was one of the most highly developed countries in the
Middle East
, offering a majority of its people electricity, potable
water, free education, sewage treatment, and according to the
World Health Organization, access to health care. Since the UN
originated the use of economic sanctions in 1945,
Iraq
was the first (and only) nation to suffer under comprehensive
sanctions, in which the UN controls virtually all of the exports
and imports of a nation. The
US
, as the most powerful member of the UN Security Council, was
instrumental in delaying or choking off imports of food, medicine,
and other necessities. Again, estimates vary, but anywhere from
250,000 to 500,000 Iraqi children died as a result of the economic
sanctions. The mortality rate for children under five tripled
between 1989 and 1997. From 1990 to 1995, the infant mortality
rate doubled. Safe drinking water availability was down 50% from
pre-Gulf War levels. Malaria and other diseases became
epidemics. School enrollment for Iraqis from ages 6-23 dropped by
53%. While some of the statistics and numbers are subject to
debate, what is indisputable is that the severe economic sanctions
(spear-headed by the
United States
) resulted in suffering, misery and death for many innocent
civilians, while Saddam Hussein, the target of
America
's wrath, continued to prosper.
It is worthwhile to note that while Iraqis were
suffering under brutal economic sanctions driven by the
US
, Dick Cheney (a poster child for
America
's ruling Plutocracy) was the CEO of Halliburton Corporation (from
1995 to 2000), and was prospering nicely. When he left to become
Vice President, they bestowed him with a parting gift of $34
million. The Washington Post reported that during Cheney's tenure
as CEO, Halliburton sold $73 million worth of services and
equipment to
Iraq
to rebuild its oil infrastructure. Cheney, a true capitalist, was
not about to let Hussein’s enemy status stand in his way of
making a profit.
The
business of
America
WAS business….now it is war
When Bush II assumed office in 2000,
US
leadership took its obsession with Hussein and
Iraq
to a new level. Surrounding himself with men like Donald Rumsfeld,
Dick Cheney, and Paul Wolfowitz, three Neocons who were veterans
of the reign of Bush I, Bush crafted the "Bush
Doctrine". Under the Bush Doctrine, the United States
proclaimed its indisputable right to engage in pre-emptive war
against those they deemed
to be terrorists or rogue states, and asserted the US right to act
unilaterally (without regard for international law or the UN). Two
other aspects of this hubristic, bellicose, machismo-driven
set of principles included the
US
intent to keep its "military strengths beyond challenge"
and the
US
objective that it would actively seek to promote "democracy and
freedom in all regions of the world". The members of
America
’s military industrial complex were elated.
America
was (and still is) the largest war machine in the history of
humanity. To ice their cake, the profit hungry Capitalists now had
publicly-stated policy that its government partners were going to
“unleash the beast” on the world. After seeing the
"democracy and freedom" the US Oligarchy helped
perpetuate in
Iraq
when Hussein was our ally (not to mention numerous similar
examples in
Latin America
), do Americans really need to ask why many in the world hate
us?
Lies and
consequences…..
The weapons of mass destruction Saddam Hussein
had created with materials supplied by the
US
under the Reagan administration had been destroyed or rendered
harmless under UN supervision by 1996. However, for over a year
prior to the March, 2003 invasion of the sovereign nation of
Iraq
, the Aristocracy governing
America
bombarded the “commoners” with a stream of propaganda designed
to prey on fears fostered by 9/11. With little to support their
pathetically flimsy arguments that Saddam Hussein (their own
creation and former ally) had somehow amassed a cache of WMDs
after his disarmament in 1996, and that Hussein (a secular leader)
had formed close ties with Osama bin Laden (a radical Muslim),
they utilized the power of the herd mentality to gain popular
support for the war they craved. Growing bodies of evidence,
including the absence of WMDs in US-occupied Iraq, the findings of
the 9/11 Commission, and the Downing Street Memos, indicate
that the US Oligarchs lied to Congress and to the American people
to garner support to launch their war (in defiance of the UN).
As of 8/4/05, 1,827
US
soldiers had died in combat and 13,559 had been wounded. Estimates
of civilian casualties caused by the
US
invasion vary from 25,000 to the 100,000 reported in the
reputable British medical journal, The Lancet.
Discrepancies aside, an obscene number of innocents have been
slaughtered. Human Rights Watch notes that a significant number of
the civilian casualties resulted from the decision of the
US
military to use cluster munitions in highly populated areas, a
violation of international humanitarian laws of war. These laws
oblige armed forces to "refrain from attacks that are
indiscriminate or where expected civilian harm exceeds the
military gain."
America
entered the war in defiance of the UN and riding on Congressional
and public support based on the lies of the Bush Administration.
Thousands and thousands of people have died. They have wasted
billions of dollars. American leaders have defied international
law by using cluster munitions and torturing prisoners of war.
What was that question again? Why do they hate us?
Get on
the gravy train……
Now that the military industrial complex has
torn Iraqi infrastructure down, someone will need to rebuild it.
Who could possibly be up to such a task? With an estimated price
tag of over $100 billion to rebuild post-war
Iraq
, the Corporatacracy is lining up for the contracts. Bechtel was
at the head of the line as they received a $680 million contract
in April of 2003. As Dick Cheney continues to receive
deferred compensation from Halliburton at the rate of $1 million
per year, Halliburton's subsidiary, Kellogg Brown and Root secured
a 10 year contract (with an open-ended budget) to provide
support services to the US military starting in 2001, and is heavily
exercising that contract in Iraq. The
US
government paid KBR $3.6 billion in 2003 and $5.4 billion in 2004
for Iraq-related work. As the number two
US
contractor in
Iraq
, Bechtel's war-related revenue was over $4 billion in 2004.
Halliburton is under investigation for charges of over-billing to
the tune of $1 billion, while Bechtel has been plagued by problems
related to shoddy work. While flag waving propaganda may fool some
Americans into believing the war in
Iraq
is "making the world safe for democracy", many in the
rest of the world see the profit motive that has led to so much
human suffering. I cannot imagine what could possibly motivate
detestation of the Red, White, Blue, and Green(backs).
Terrorist acts and acts of military aggression
are morally repugnant. Those committing these crimes deserve to
face justice. Regrettably, as evidenced by the poignant example of
Iraq, the leaders of the
United States
have been committing war crimes and acts of terrorism for years
without consequence. While the US has rendered justice upon its
attackers throughout its tenure as the world’s superpower (and
has rendered a grossly misplaced justice on the “terrorists”
by invading Iraq), the rest of the world has had little choice but
to turn the other cheek when it comes to the profiteering,
imperialism, and state-sponsored terrorism perpetrated by
America’s Oligarchy. Acting with impunity and arrogance,
America’s leaders have an unprecedented military might at their
disposal, possess a nuclear arsenal powerful enough to destroy the
world thousands of times over, ignore international law but impose
it on others, use the UN to inflict damage on other
nations but openly defy its rules, hoard the world’s riches and
resources, defile the Earth which sustains us, support ruthless
dictators, and employ terrorism through the CIA. George Bush knows
why they hate us, and he likes it……
Jason Miller is a 38 year old free-lance
activist writer with a degree in liberal arts. He is a husband
and a father to three boys. His affiliations include
Amnesty International, the ACLU and the Americans United for
Separation of Church and State. He welcomes responses at willpowerful@hotmail.com
or comments on his blog at http://civillibertarian.blogspot.com/.
Translate
this page
(In accordance with Title 17
U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to
those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational purposes.
Information Clearing House has no affiliation whatsoever with the
originator of this article nor is Information Clearing House
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.) |