Only in U.S. Can You Destroy Another State's
Plane In Their Own Country And Call It
20, 2017 "Information
- Let's see how the Corporate Media is going to
spin this one!
is out of the bag: the United States is the main
sponsor of terrorism, using its henchmen - ISIS
- to commit unspeakable acts, in pursuit of
regime change, oil, gas and other spoils for the
Step Toward Devastating War
American pilot shot down a Syrian fighter that
was attacking ISIS, thus confirming that
Washington is not fighting ISIS, as Washington
claims, but is protecting ISIS, its agent sent
to Syria by Obama and Hillary to overthrow the
Syrian government. General Michael Flynn
revealed on a TV interview that Obama and
Hillary had, over his objection as director of
the Defense Intelligence Agency, made the
“willful decision” to send ISIS to Syria.
Washington’s pretense that Washington is
fighting ISIS, rather than supporting it, is the
excuse for Washington’s illegal presence in the
Syrian conflict. Russia and Iran are in Syria
legally, invited there by an elected government.
The Americans are there uninvited as war
criminals. Under international law established
by the Americans themselves, it is a war crime
to initiate aggression against a country that
has not raised a fist against you.
be in Syria, Washington has to pretend to be
“fighting terrorism” rather than supporting it.
The lie has been given to this claim many times,
but now that an American pilot has proven that
the US is in Syria to support its agent, ISIS,
not even a Megyn Kelly presstitute can honestly
claim to believe that Washington is fighting
track US planes as 'targets' as Syria tensions
says US downing of Syrian jet was 'act of
aggression' and that planes west of Euphrates
river will be tracked as 'aerial targets'
Pentagon Responds with: "US Pilots Will Defend
Themselves If Attacked By Russians"
Why not get out of Syria? We have no business
there! The American People have been very clear
in their request: "No war with Syria!"
public opposes war despite media propaganda
is not popular with Americans. In fact, a new
Reuters/Ipsos poll found that only nine percent
of Americans support a military attack on Syria.
This makes a war on Syria even less popular than
Congress. The poll was taken while reports of
the chemical attack were in the news. There has
been consistent propaganda for war on all the
networks for months now, but the people are not
buying it. ( 2013)
Polls show Americans don't want war in Syria
public is also concerned about the repercussions
against the U.S. in the region that would result
from an attack on Syria. Three in four (74
percent) believe there would be a backlash
against the U.S. in the Middle East in the
aftermath of an American attack. The public has
a better understanding of lessons learned in the
region than most policymakers do.
Americans are just tired of war and who can
blame them? (2013)
recent poll shows that Americans have not
changed their minds about a war with Syria:
Poll: Most Americans Don’t Want U.S. Troops in
one in five Americans favor an increased U.S.
troop presence in Syria, according to the
results of a CBS News poll released Monday.
world is now perhaps closer to World War Three
than it has been in five decades as the
situation in Syria is heating up yet again. In
less than 24 hours, the United States has
attacked the Syrian military, Iran has launched
missiles into Syria, Russia is threatening to
shoot down American planes, and the United
States is digging in its heels and threatening
to continue to provoke both the Russians and the
that about sums up the current micro-version of
the situation, it’s important to get a rundown
of just what led up to the precipice we are all
problem is that Washington won’t accept a
half-loaf solution because it remains committed
to its goal of breaking up Syria, removing Assad,
and controlling the vital resources in the
Middle East in order to maintain its global
going to take time and patience to discourage
Washington’s aggressive behavior. There’s no
easy fix. The resistance must be firm but
flexible. Their national interests must be
defended, but a broader war must be avoided.
Washington must be gradually acclimated to the
idea that it no longer rules the world, that its
interests aren’t served by its erratic and
destabilizing foreign policy, and that it must
comply with international law.
the United States in the direction of a
multipolar world in which its own narrow
interests are not paramount, is going to take
time. But what other choice is there; World War
want to start a war, the unwashed masses must be
convinced to send their brothers, sons and
fathers to die on the front lines. The specter
of an external enemy must be etched into their
collective mind through trauma, exaggeration and
repetition. History must be whitewashed, twisted
and cherry picked down to a politicized nursery
rhyme. At no point should the real motives or
consequences of such an endeavor be discussed.
stands to reason that if we want to STOP a war
we must reverse this pattern.
start with a realistic look at the consequences:
United States and Russia alone possess a total
of over 15,000 nuclear warheads (as of 2014),
each of which are 10 to 30 times more powerful
than those that the U.S. used against Japan in
Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
the Soviet era it was understood that a hot war
between these two countries would inevitably
lead to the use of these weapons, and would
therefore be an act of mass suicide. This idea
was so deeply engrained, that it had its own
acronym: M.A.D. (Mutually Assured Destruction).
In recent years scientists have realized that
this should be taken as a literal truth,
regardless of which side may suffer the most in
the initial exchange.
nuclear war between just these two countries,
utilizing only the weapons which are slated to
be active after the implementation of the START
treaty in 2018, would release over 150 million
tons of debris into the atmosphere. This debris
would block out the sun, dropping global
temperatures between 8 and 30 degrees
centigrade. Agriculture would become impossible.
Mass extinctions would follow, and our species
would not likely be exempt.
a mild description. We’re not even touching upon
the direct consequences of the blasts,
firestorms, and radiation poisoning or the
secondary deaths caused by exposure, and
course America’s political establishment has a
good reason to play chicken with all of our
lives, and the future of this planet. The
balance of geopolitical and financial power has
been shifting, and not in Washington’s favor.
new Silk Road project, Asian Infrastructure
Investment Bank, and outposts in the South China
Sea, in tandem with the Eurasian Union
spearheaded by Russia, are edging the United
States out of the world’s new center of gravity.
have failed, bilateral discussions have gotten
nowhere, sanctions have backfired, trade
agreements have stalled, influence has eroded…
Washington is running out of options, and time.
dollar denominated financial system has peaked.
This is the end of a debt super cycle, and of
the petrodollar. The next leg down is going to
powers that be would rather tip the board, than
lose the game. They’d rather take us to war,
than take the blame. And if you let them get
away with it, that’s just the beginning.
This article was first published by
views expressed in this article are solely those
of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
opinions of Information Clearing House.