By Abby Zimet
June 02, 2018 "Information Clearing House" - In what's been called "the most racist jury 'award' in history," a Florida jury has decided there was really no problem with cops shooting and killing Gregory Vaughn Hill Jr., 30, in 2014 because he was playing music too loudly in his own garage while drunk. (Need we add, Hill was black?) The civil verdict marked the dismal end to a longstanding wrongful death suit filed by Hill’s family in 2016, two years after St. Lucie County sheriff deputies turned up at Hill's house in Fort Pierce following complaints he'd been playing loud "F.U. music" in his garage as a nearby middle school was letting out for the day.
When Hill heard the cops knock, he opened the garage door, saw them, and began closing it again, at which point deputy Christopher Newman shot him three times - once in the head, twice in the abdomen - through the door, because everyone knows that according to the impeccable standards of American jurisprudence, getting drunk, playing music and closing a garage door are punishable by death without a trial. Police later claimed he'd had a gun they told him to drop - a claim never proved - and then said they'd found a gun (unloaded) in Hill's back pocket; they also determined his blood alcohol level was almost five times the legal limit for driving, though probably pretty close to that of many people getting drunk in their garage while listening to music.
Are You Tired Of The Lies And Non-Stop Propaganda?
Nonetheless, jurors found Newman, who had already cleared by a grand jury of criminal conduct, not guilty of “unreasonable, negligent and excessive” force under Florida's black-guys-are-scary law. Jurors were also asked to determine the amount of compensation to award Hill’s three children for their loss; the family was seeking $500,000, but jurors instead opted to give them $4 total - $1 to his mother for his funeral expenses, and $1 to each of his children.
The grievous punchline: The jury unfathomably found Hill 99% liable for his own murder because “under the influence of alcoholic beverages to the extent that his normal faculties were impaired” - that death penalty offense again - thus reducing the family's award, and law enforcement's liability, to pennies. The family's attorney called the ruling "punitive"; Hill's family wants a new trial; his fiancée vowed to "keep fighting until I get some justice." On Facebook, the sheriff's office declared, "We are pleased to see this difficult and tragic incident come to a conclusion" and wished “everyone involved in the case the best." One concise comment summed up the general response: "Murderers."
This article was originally published by "Common Dreams"-
The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Information Clearing House.
Join the Discussion
It is not necessary for ICH readers to register before placing a comment. We ask that you treat others with respect. Take a moment to read the following - Comment Policy - What Or Who is Information Clearing House and Purpose and Intent of this website: It is unacceptable to slander, smear or engage in personal attacks on authors of articles posted on ICH. Those engaging in that behavior will be banned from the comment section.