Australia Isn't A Nation, It's A US
Military Base With Kangaroos
By Caitlin Johnstone
One of the many, many signs that Australia is
nothing more than a US military and intelligence
asset is the way its government has consistently
refused to intervene to protect Australian
citizen Julian Assange from political
persecution at the hands of the US empire.
In a new article titled "Penny
Wong moves to dampen expectation of breakthrough
in Julian Assange case," The Guardian quotes
Australia's foreign minister as saying, “We are
doing what we can, between government and
government, but there are limits to what that
diplomacy can achieve.” Wong said this when
asked if Prime Minister Anthony Albanese
discussed the world's most famous
press freedom case with the US president and
British prime minister when he met with them
together two weeks ago.
Wong
refused to say whether her government's
leader had raised the issue with his supposed US
and UK counterparts, repeating instead the same
line she's been
bleating since Labor took over: that the
Assange case “has dragged on long enough and
should be brought to a close.” Which if you
listen carefully isn't actually a statement in
favor of releasing the WikiLeaks founder or
blocking extradition — it's just saying the case
should be concluded hastily, one way or another.
These statements came in response to
questions from Greens Senator David Shoebridge,
who took a jab at the Labor government's
"quiet diplomacy" approach to the Assange
case.
“The idea that quiet diplomacy must be so
silent that the government can’t tell the public
or the parliament if the PM even spoke to the
president is bizarre,” Shoebridge said.
The answers given to me by Senator Wong and the answers provided to @MrRexPatrick make it clear:
“quiet diplomacy” to bring Julian Assange home by the Albanese Govt is a policy of nothing. Not one meeting, phone call or letter sent. pic.twitter.com/qphxi9g29p
Wong
told Shoebridge that Australia is powerless
to intervene to protect the acclaimed Australian
journalist, saying, "We are not able as an
Australian government to intervene in another
country's legal or court processes."
While it is true that Australia can't
force the US to end the political
imprisonment and persecution of Assange for
exposing US war crimes, it obviously can conduct
diplomacy with its supposed ally in order to
protect an Australian citizen. Even nations with
whom Australia has no form of alliance are
vocally confronted by Canberra when they
imprison Australian citizens, like the
statement Wong released yesterday regarding
China's detention of Chinese-Australian
journalist Cheng Lei in which the foreign
minister explicitly and unequivocally calls for
"Ms Cheng to be reunited with her family."
Just yesterday alone Wong tweeted to demand
justice for Cheng and for American
journalist Evan Gershkovich, who has been
arrested in Russia on espionage charges.
"It is one year since Australian citizen
Cheng Lei faced a closed trial in Beijing on
national security charges,"
tweeted Wong. "She is yet to learn the
outcome. Our thoughts are with Ms Cheng and her
loved ones. Australia will continue to advocate
for her to be reunited with her children."
"Australia is deeply concerned by Russia’s
detention of Wall Street Journal Moscow
correspondent Evan Gershkovich. We call on
Russia to ensure access to consular and legal
assistance," Wong
tweeted a few hours later.
Now guess how many times Penny Wong has
tweeted the word "Assange"?
Australian Foreign Minister @SenatorWong has never once tweeted the word "Assange" and says Australia is powerless to intervene against the US, yet in the last 24 hours she has tweeted demanding justice for an Australian journalist in China and an American journalist in Russia. pic.twitter.com/X8CPK8Wy1R
What is the basis for this discrepancy? Why
has Australia's foreign minister been publicly
demanding that China release Cheng Lei and
return her to her children, without making the
same demands of the US for Julian Assange?
Assange has children too, and he has been
imprisoned for
four times longer than Cheng — more than ten
times longer if you count the period of
his arbitrary detention in the Ecuadorian
embassy in London before his arrest. Why are we
seeing more action from the Australian
government to defend an Australian journalist in
China than to defend an Australian journalist
fighting extradition to a nation we're
supposedly allied with which upholds itself as
the leader of the rules-based international
order?
The answer is that Australia is not a real
country. It's
an American colony. It's a giant US military
base with kangaroos.
That's why the Albanese government's "quiet
diplomacy" to free Assange is so quiet that it
can't actually be said to exist.
Regular readers may recall that
the last time we discussed an interaction
between Senators Wong and Shoebridge was when
the former condescendingly dismissed the
latter's efforts to find out if the Australian
government is allowing the US military to bring
nuclear weapons into the country. Wong
angrily told Shoebridge that the US has a
standing "neither confirm nor deny" position
with regard to where it keeps its nuclear
weapons, and that the Australian government
understands and respects that position.
Australians Aren't Allowed To Know If There Are American Nukes In Australia
"It's assumed to be none of Australia's business whether there are foreign nuclear weapons in Australia."https://t.co/uYoTUDLlrF
We're so far under Washington's thumb that
we're not even allowed to know if there are
American nukes in our country, and our own
government can't even advocate in defense of its
own citizen when he's being persecuted for the
crime of good journalism.
Which would be bad enough if these bastards
weren't pushing us to
play a front-and-center role in World War
Three. We've got to start fighting against our
enslavement to the US empire and against the
Pentagon puppets in our own government like our
lives depend on it, because they very clearly
do.
Views expressed in this article are
solely those of the author and do not necessarily
reflect the opinions of Information Clearing House. in this article are
solely those of the author and do not necessarily
reflect the opinions of Information Clearing House.
Reader financed- No
Advertising - No Government Grants -
No Algorithm - This
Is Independent
In accordance
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material
is distributed without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational
purposes. Information Clearing House has no
affiliation whatsoever with the originator of
this article nor is Information ClearingHouse
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)