US, Israel Acknowledge
Terror Attack, Murder of Imad Mughniyah
By Moon Of Alabama
February 01, 2015 "ICH"
- In the Washington Post Adam Goldman and
Ellen Nakashima
report today on the 2008 death of
Hizbullah operator Imad Mughniyah.
On the same day Jeff Stein
reports the same story for Newsweek.
There are some differences in the details.
Mughniyah died from a tire
blowout on a spare tire. The tire was filled
with C4 explosives and metal balls and
exploded at the back of a Toyota 4wd when
Mughniyah walked past.
So far it had been assumed
that the assassination had been a Mossad
plot but the "news" in the story, based on
"former U.S. intelligence officials", is
that the CIA was heavily involved and that
Bush gave the order to kill Mughniyah.
Two Israeli reporters,
sometimes disseminators for Mossad
phantasies,
add some not so important bits.
The main difference
between the two main stories, important in
its legal aspect, is in who pressed the
button. The Washington Post version:
The device was triggered
remotely from Tel Aviv by agents with
Mossad, the Israeli foreign intelligence
service, who were in communication with
the operatives on the ground in
Damascus. “The way it was set up, the
U.S. could object and call it off, but
it could not execute,” said a former
U.S. intelligence official.
The Newsweek version:
The kill was made all the
harder by the way the bomb would be
detonated. There was a two-second delay
from the time the CIA and Mossad agents
in the lookout post pushed the button to
when the bomb exploded. Under the plan,
the Mossad agent would ID Mugniyah, and
the CIA man would press the remote
control.
...
Finally, on the night of February 12,
2008, after two months of
round-the-clock surveillance, they
caught Mugniyah alone.
“They made a positive
ID. Click. One, one thousand; two, one
thousand...ka-boom.
So in the Neweek version
some CIA guy is guilty of murder while in
the Washington Post version somebody in Tel
Aviv should be hanged for it.
According to
Elijah J. Magnier, who in 2008 reported the
story from the Syrian side, the Newsweek
version is the more correct one. Magnier
also had some additional details in his
tweets today.
But aside from the content
of the story, which I do not believe to be
really relevant, there are questions that
could need some answers:
Why is the Washington Post
"dumping" the story into the Friday
evening/Saturday morning news hole? Usually
such a story would be published Saturday
evening/Sunday morning thereby and fetch
some time on the Sunday shows.
Why is the story coming
out now? Has it to do with the spat between
Obama and Netanyahoo? Is it a diversion from
Israel's recent loss against Hizbullah? Has
it to do with the U.S. negotiations with
Iran?
The story was obviously
ready for some time to be put out by two
competing papers. Both were likely waiting
for a go from their sources to publish it.
Why was the "go" given now? By whom?
http://www.moonofalabama.org/