Failed U.S. Strategic Concepts: War on Terror and State
Sponsor of Terrorism
By Michael S. Rozeff
April 07, 2015 "ICH"
- "LR"
- The War on Terror, U.S. policy since 2001, has been a disastrously bad
strategic concept, helping to propel American aggressions and wars against
several countries that were hugely fruitless, costly, destructive and
counter-productive. There are an order of magnitude more jihadist forces today
than 14 years go. Huge numbers of innocent people have been slaughtered, wounded
and displaced. Huge numbers have seen their living standards plummet. America
has turned into a police state and a national security surveillance state bereft
of fundamental rights and inundated with propaganda. The U.S. War on Terror,
which continues to this day, has responsibility.Another
strategic concept adopted by the U.S. government that’s related to the War on
Terror is “Terrorist State” or “State Sponsor of Terrorism”. This designation
involves breaking or strained relations, isolation, sanctions, threats,
confrontations and other such actions that are short of war but raise the
likelihood of war. Iran is on the State Department list. Netanyahu, missing no
opportunity to raise fears of Iran and goad the U.S. into viewing Iran as a
deadly enemy, has today referred to Iran as “the pre-eminent terrorist state of
our time”. He is completely wrong to view the hostility of Muslims worldwide to
Israel’s treatment of Palestinians as terrorism, and he is also wrong to view
Iran as the main bearer of such sentiments. As long as Israel continues to
expand its territory and deny Palestinian rights, this hostility will remain at
a personal level even if some Muslim states make peace with Israel and normalize
some relations. Netanyahu’s rhetoric shows how strongly the concept of terrorist
state is and how strongly it’s embedded in strategic thinking. His rhetoric
shows how such a concept blocks a peaceful resolution.
Both strategies, the “War on Terror” and “Terrorist State”,
designate enemies. They are belligerent in nature, eschewing diplomacy. They
make war or raise the prospect of war. They place the U.S. in a military mode.
They employ a militaristic model of state-to-state relations. The U.S. gets
locked onto a warpath that goes on indefinitely or at least for a very long
time. This warpath stymies the normalization of relations. It institutionalizes
war by building up war industries and war parties at home. Americans are
indoctrinated into war thinking, seeing enemies at every turn, and seeing no
other options except those of confrontation, threat, sanctions and wars. What is
worse, all of these negatives fail to create positive outcomes in any terms.
There are no fewer terrorists. The costs are high. American living standards are
harmed. There is no peace, no improvement in the general welfare, no additional
security. These strategies are utter failures.
At long last, after years upon end of failures that trace back
to such bad strategic concepts as War on Terror and State Sponsor of Terrorism,
a president has seen fit to negotiate with Iran. Finally. And this is but one
step on a path of rapprochement in which America and Iran develop friendly
relations, viewing each other with respect and recognizing each other’s
civilizations and cultures.
But major elements in the U.S. legislative branch resist
diplomacy with Iran. They are still locked into these failed concepts. They are
so blind that they want to redouble American efforts based on the same faulty
ideas that have brought failure after failure. The hold of Israeli hawks over
certain factions within the U.S. government remains strong. Politicians like
Netanyahu transfer the embattled psychology of Israel onto America, where it has
no place and where it is totally dysfunctional, producing immensely evil
results.
War and belligerence toward other states, as codified,
legalized and institutionalized in wrong-headed concepts like War on Terror and
Terrorist State, must be repudiated.
Email Michael S. Rozeff