FBI Tracked Chattanooga Shooter's Family for Years
By Tony Cartalucci
July 17, 2015 "Information
Clearing House"
- Once again, another convenient shooting has
helped supercharge anger, hatred, fear, and division across the
Western World after an alleged "Islamist extremist" opened fire on
and killed 4 US Marines at a recruiting station in Chattanooga,
Tennessee.
Without
any knowledge of how the US has in fact created Al Qaeda and its
many global affiliates, including vicious terrorist groups plaguing
Southeast Asia, and the most notorious to date, the so-called
"Islamic State" (ISIS), the American public will predictably react
in a manner that will simply further justify America's meddling
across the globe amid its self-created and perpetuated "War on
Terror." It will also help in efforts to further tighten control
over the American public itself, with increased justifications for
expanding police state measures and future pushes to disarm the
American people.Yahoo News would report in
their article, "Shootings
at Chattanooga military facilities leave 4 Marines, gunman dead; act
called 'domestic terrorism'," that:
A U.S. official told the Associated Press that
Abdulazeez had not been on the radar of federal law enforcement
before Thursday's shooting.
But also added:
His father had been investigated several years
ago for "possible ties to a foreign terrorist organization" and
added to the U.S. terrorist watch list, according to a report in
the New York Times, but that probe did not surface information
about Abdulazeez, the paper said.
This means that yet another case of "domestic terror"
has involved someone either investigated by the FBI, entrapped by an
active FBI operation
where FBI investigators posed as terrorist leaders and walked a
patsy through every step of a terrorist attack before arresting them
and thus "foiling" the attack, or linked directly to someone the FBI
was investigating.
Ironically, the immense omnipresent police state the West has
erected to combat the so-called "terrorist" threat, including the
total surveillance of all communications online and across all
telecommunication networks, at home and abroad under the National
Security Agency (NSA) will only expand, despite it once again
apparently failing, and despite attempts by special interests on
Wall Street and in Washington to claim this latest attack "again"
somehow circumvented these already sweeping measures.
Meanwhile, The US Continues Supporting Extremists Abroad
And while this latest attack is passed off as a "domestic terrorist
attack" and the result of "Islamic extremists," rather than a false
flag event, the US continues to openly support the very "terrorists"
it claims threatens its homeland and has inspired these sort of
attacks.
Just recently, the Washington Post literally allowed a spokesman of
Al Qaeda to defend his faction's role in the fighting in Syria, and
his condemnation of the United States for not rendering more aid for
the cause of overrunning and destroying the Syrian nation - a goal
the US itself is likewise pursuing.
Labib Al Nahhas, "head of foreign political relations" for terrorist
organization Ahrar al-Sham, wrote in his Washington Post op-ed
titled, "The
deadly consequences of mislabeling Syria’s revolutionaries,"
that:
Stuck inside their own bubble, White House
policymakers have allocated millions of U.S. taxpayer dollars to
support failed CIA efforts to support so-called “moderate”
forces in Syria. But these “moderate” groups have proved to be a
disappointment on nearly every count, not least of all in
confronting the Islamic State.
He also states:
That question should prompt Washington to
admit that the Islamic State’s extremist ideology can be
defeated only through a homegrown Sunni alternative — with the
term “moderate” defined not by CIA handlers but by Syrians
themselves.
Essentially, the Washington Post afforded a terrorist
organization space to make an appeal to the American public for
military support. Ahrar al-Sham regularly coordinates with and
fights within operations led by Al Qaeda's Al Nusra Front, a
US
State Department designated terrorist organization from which
ISIS itself sprung.
Al Nusra and Ahrar al-Sham are described as the "closest" of allies
by Western think-tanks and media reports. It is also revealed that
Ahrar al-Sham worked along side ISIS itself.
A Stanford University report under "Mapping
Militant Organizations" explained (emphasis added):
Ahrar al-Sham quickly became one of the
largest military organizations operating in Syria, and it has
been active in efforts to unite the Islamist opposition under a
single banner. It rejects the idea of Western intervention but
sometimes works alongside Free Syrian Army brigades. It
routinely cooperates with al-Nusra and, until relations
soured in 2013, also worked with ISIS. In February 2014, the
U.S. Director of National Intelligence called Ahrar al-Sham one
of the three most effective rebel groups in Syria.
The Washington Post isn't the only voice in the
Western media promoting Al Qaeda. Foreign Policy in 2012 abhorrently
proclaimed, "Two
Cheers for Syrian Islamists: So the rebels aren't secular
Jeffersonians. As far as America is concerned, it doesn't much
matter." As much as an admission that the US is backing what is
essentially terrorism in Syria, the Foreign Policy article attempted
even then to promote the alleged "pragmatism" of supporting Al Qaeda
to eliminate America's foreign enemies.
|
Image:
100's of trucks a day pass over Turkey's border with Syria,
destined for ISIS territory. NATO literally is supplying
ISIS with an endless torrent of supplies, weapons, and
fighters meaning that no matter how many token airstrikes
the US carries out, many times more fighters and materiel
will fill the void. |
And while Foreign Policy and terrorists writing in the pages of the
Washington Post demand more weapons and support from the West,
it is already a documented fact that immense and constantly
flowing supply convoys are streaming out of both NATO-member Turkey
and US-ally Jordan's territory, into Syria and Iraq, for the purpose
of resupplying ISIS. This explains ISIS' otherwise inexplicable
ability to not only maintain its impressive fighting capacity as it
simultaneously wages war against both the Syrian and Iraqi armies,
but to expand its fighting to all fronts opposed to US regional
hegemony.
This includes Yemen, Libya, and even Egypt where ISIS most recently
managed to hit an Egyptian naval vessel with a missile. Foreign
Policy would again weigh in. Their article, "Islamic
State Sinai Affiliate Claims to Have Hit Egyptian Ship With Missile,"
states:
The use of a guided missile to strike an
Egyptian ship represents a higher level of technological
sophistication than what has been previously observed in Sinai
attacks. It is unclear, however, exactly what kind of missile
was used in the attack, beyond the militant group’s claim that
it was a guided munition.
Militant groups in the region have in the past
used guided missiles to attack government ships in the
Mediterranean. During the 2006 war between Israel and Hezbollah,
an Iranian anti-ship missile fired by the militant group struck
the Israeli warship Hanit, badly damaging the vessel and killing
four crew members.
Of course, Foreign Policy and others across the Western media will
be quick to point out that Hezbollah is a state-sponsored militant
organization which receives its weapons from Syria and Iran. The
question then becomes how ISIS replicated this level of
"technological sophistication," and which state-sponsors put the
missiles into their hands.
The US supporting Al Qaeda is not really news. Al Qaeda was
initially a joint US-Saudi venture to create a mercenary army to
fight the Soviets in Afghanistan during the 1980's. This mercenary
army would again fight Russian interests in Serbia and Chechnya
before eventually being used as the pretext for US invasions and
occupations of both Afghanistan and Iraq from 2001 onward. In 2007,
it was revealed that the US, Saudi Arabia, and Israel sought to
use the terrorist organization to raise a proxy military front to
overthrow Syria and Iran. The resulting bloodbath in Syria beginning
in 2011 is the operational execution of this documented conspiracy.
Al Qaeda and its various affiliates serve both as a proxy mercenary
front to strike where Western forces cannot, and a pretext to invade
abroad. It also serves as a constant justification for increased
tyranny at home. With the most recent shooting carried out by yet
another target of the FBI's "investigations," and the predictable
divisive backlash that will follow, it is assured that the American
public will be further blinded to the fact that this so-called
"Islamic extremism" was born in Washington and on Wall Street, in
Riyadh and Tel Aviv, not in a mosque or springing forth from the
pages of the Qu'ran.
In fact, the vast majority of the world's Islamic people are locked
in mortal combat with the West's mercenary terrorist forces, with
tens of thousands of them having shed their blood fighting Al Qaeda
everywhere from Libya to Egypt, to Iraq and Syria. While the US
attempts to pose as the leading power in the fight against
extremism, its token airstrikes deep within Syrian territory are
quickly undone by the torrent of supplies it itself oversees
flooding into Syrian territory. For every fighter killed by a US
airstrike, 10 more are being trafficked in through US and NATO-run
networks stretching as far afield
as Xinjiang, China.
The US presence in Iraq and Syria serves simply as one of several
planned stepping stones to eventually and directly intervene
militarily in toppling either or both governments, before moving on
to Tehran.
The "War
on Terror" is a fraud, and each "terrorist attack" a carefully
orchestrated means of further perpetuating that fraud.
Via
http://landdestroyer.blogspot.ca/2015/07/fbi-tracked-chattanooga-shooters-family.html
|
Click for
Spanish,
German,
Dutch,
Danish,
French,
translation- Note-
Translation may take a
moment to load.
What's your response?
-
Scroll down to add / read comments
Please
read our
Comment Policy
before posting -
It is unacceptable to slander, smear or engage in personal attacks on authors of articles posted on ICH.
Those engaging in that behavior will be banned from the comment section.
|
|
|