Brussels meeting is also expected to water down demands that at
least 22 countries accept obligatory quotas for refugees
By Ian Traynor
September 14, 2015 "Information
Clearing House" - "The
Guardian" -
EU governments are expected to back radical
new plans for the detention of “irregular migrants”, the creation of
large new refugee camps in Italy and Greece and longer-term aims for
the funding and building of refugee camps outside the EU to try to
stop people coming to
Europe.
A crunch meeting of EU interior
ministers in Brussels, called to grapple with Europe’s largest
refugee crisis since the second world war, was also expected to
water down demands from the European commission, strongly supported
by Germany, for the obligatory sharing of refugees across at least
22 countries.
A four-page draft statement, prepared on Monday
morning by EU ambassadors before the ministers met, focused on
“Fortress Europe” policies amid increasing confusion as a number of
countries set up border controls in the Schengen free-travel area
that embraces 26 countries.
The draft statement, obtained by the Guardian,
said “reception facilities will be organised so as to temporarily
accommodate people” in Greece and Italy while they are identified,
registered, and finger-printed. Their asylum claims are to be
processed quickly and those who fail are to be deported promptly,
the ministers say in the draft statement.
“It is crucial that robust mechanisms become
operational immediately in Italy and Greece to ensure
identification, registration and fingerprinting of migrants; to
identify persons in need of international protection and support
their relocation; and to identify irregular migrants to be
returned.”
The Europeans are to set up “rapid border
intervention teams” to be deployed at “sensitive external borders”.
Failed asylum seekers who are expected to try to move to another EU
country from Greece or Italy can be interned, the statement says.
“When voluntary return is not practicable and
other measures on return are inadequate to prevent secondary
movements, detention measures ... should be applied.”
The
European commission demanded last week that at least 22 EU
countries accept a new system of quotas for refugees, with 160,000
redistributed from Greece, Italy and Hungary under a binding new
system.
Germany is insisting on the binding nature of the
proposed scheme and
its unilateral decision on Sunday to re-establish national
border controls within the Schengen area was widely seen as an
attempt to force those resisting mandatory quotas to yield. The
resistance is strongest in eastern and central Europe.
The draft says ministers are “committed” to
sharing the 160,000, but made no mention of the system being
obligatory, said no formal decision on the matter would be taken
until next month and appeared to dilute the commission’s call by
describing it as “the basis” for a decision, which would also pay
“due regard to the flexibility that could be needed by member states
in the implementation of the decision, in particular to accommodate
unforeseen developments”.
In the medium-term, the draft says, the EU should
aim at funding and building refugee camps outside Europe and that
failed asylum-seekers could be sent from Europe to these camps,
which would not be in their countries of origin.
The EU should aim “at developing safe and
sustainable reception capacities in the affected regions and
providing lasting prospects and adequate procedures for refugees and
their families until return to their country of origin is possible”.
EU governments would then be “in a position to
find asylum applications of these persons inadmissible on safe third
country grounds ... after which swift assisted return can follow”.
It is unacceptable to slander, smear or engage in personal attacks on authors of articles posted on ICH.
Those engaging in that behavior will be banned from the comment section.
In accordance
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material
is distributed without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational
purposes. Information Clearing House has no
affiliation whatsoever with the originator of
this article nor is Information ClearingHouse
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)