- What does it mean?
a breakup of the EU and NATO and, thereby, the
avoidance of World War III.
The EU and
NATO are evil institutions. These two institutions
are mechanisms created by Washington in order to
destroy the sovereignty of European peoples. These
two institutions give Washington control over the
Western world and serve both as cover and enabler of
Washington’s aggression. Without the EU and NATO,
Washington could not force Europe and the UK into
conflict with Russia, and Washington could not have
destroyed seven Muslim countries in 15 years without
being isolated as a hated war criminal government,
no member of whom could have travelled abroad
without being arrested and put on trial.
the presstitute media lied about the polls in order
to discourage the leave vote. But it did not work.
The British people have always been the font of
liberty. It was the the historic achievements of the
British that transformed law into a shield of the
people from a weapon in the hands of the state and
gave accountable government to the world. The
British, or a majority of them, understood that the
EU is a dictatorial governing mechanism in which
power is in the hands of unaccountable people and in
which law can easily be used as a weapon in the
hands of unaccountable government.
in an effort to save its power over Europe, launched
a campaign, willingly joined by presstitutes and the
brainwashed left-wing, who flocked to the One
Percent’s banner, that presented the effort to
preserve British liberty and sovereignty as racism.
This dishonest campaign shows beyond all doubt that
Washington and its media whores have no regard
whatsoever for liberty and the sovereignty of
peoples. Washington regards every assertion of
democratic rule as a barrier to its hegemony and
demonizes every democratic impulse. Reformist
leaders in Latin America are constantly overthrown
by Washington, and Washington asserts that only
Washington and its terrorist allies have the right
to choose the government of Syria, just as
Washington chose the government of Ukraine.
people, or a majority of them, gave Washington the
bird. But the fight is not over. Perhaps it hasn’t
really yet begun. Here is what the British can
likely expect: The Federal Reserve, European Central
Bank, Bank of Japan, and George Soros will conspire
to attack the British pound, driving it down and
terrorizing the British economy. We will see who is
the strongest: the will of the British people or the
will of the CIA, the One Percent, and the EU and
attack on the British economy is the reason that
leave supporters such as Boris Johnson are mistaken
in their belief that there is “no need for haste” in
exiting the EU. The longer it takes for the British
to escape from the authoritarian EU, the longer
Washington and the EU can inflict punishment on the
British people for voting to leave and the more time
the presstitutes will have to convince the British
people that their vote was a mistake. As the vote is
nonbinding, a cowardly and cowed Parliament could
reject the vote.
should step down immediately, not months from now in
October. The new British government should tell the
EU that the British people’s decision is implemented
now, not in two years and that all political and
legal relationships terminated as of the vote.
Otherwise, in two years the British will be so beat
down by punishments and propaganda that their vote
will be overturned.
government should immediately announce the
termination of its participation in Washington’s
sanctions on Russia and hook its economy to the
rising nations of Russia, China, India, and Iran.
With this support, the British can survive the
Washington led attack on their economy.
the Vote, the Odds Are Against Britain Leaving the
vote shows that a majority of the British voters
understand that the UK government represents
interests other than the interests of the British
people. As difficult as the British know it is to
hold their own government to account, they
understand they have no prospect whatsoever of
holding the EU government to account. During their
time under the EU, the British have been reminded of
historical times when law was the word of the
propagandists who comprise the Western political and
media establishments succeeded in keeping the real
issues out of public discussion and presenting the
leave vote as racism. However, enough of the British
people resisted the brainwashing and controlled
debate to grasp the real issues: sovereignty,
accountable government, financial independence,
freedom from involvement in Washington’s wars and
conflict with Russia.
people should not be so naive as to think that their
vote settles the matter. The fight has only begun.
British government to come back to the people and
say, look, the EU has given us a better deal. We can
now afford to stay in.
— The Fed,
ECB, BOJ, and NY hedge funds to pound the pound and
to short British stocks in order to convince the
British voters that their vote is sinking the
emphasis on the vote’s weakening of Europe, leaving
all to the mercy of “Russian aggression.”
— Hard to
resist bribes (and threats) to prominent members of
the leave majority and pressure on such leave
leaders as Boris Johnson to be reasonable,
concillatory and to maintain good relations with
Washington and Europe, and to reach a compromise on
remaining in the EU.
the Confederation of British Industry (CBI) to
attribute the loss of British jobs and investment
opportunities to the leave vote.
learn to think about how things really are and not
as the presstitutes present them,
you will be able to add to the list all by yourself.
the Irish voted against the EU and pressure was kept
on them until they reversed their vote. This is the
likely fate of the British.
Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary
of the Treasury for Economic Policy and associate
editor of the Wall Street Journal. He was columnist
for Business Week, Scripps Howard News Service, and
Creators Syndicate. He has had many university
appointments. His internet columns have attracted a
worldwide following. Roberts' latest books are
of Laissez Faire Capitalism and Economic Dissolution
of the West,
Neoconservative Threat to World Order.